By the way, I'm not sure what 'everything changes for a reason' means. No offense intended. It's just that video games don't have to change at all. Nobody is making it obligatory for developers to reboot or remake games. If Capcom was planning to reboot Devil May Cry anyway, they could've at least done it at a more decent time. Like, when the series ends, instead of just deciding not to develop DMC5 at all. Once you've made no less than four games in the series, I think your right to reboot something willy-nilly is lost - you've got fans to think of, after all. I think DMC should've been rebooted after DMC2, but Capcom decided to mess things up, so here we have a nonsensical character called Nero, and a reboot that does everything all over again (not that well), only tries to do it in one game. Again, no offense, just my thoughts on the game. Hoping nobody will blow stuff out of proportion.