• Welcome to the Devil May Cry Community Forum!

    We're a group of fans who are passionate about the Devil May Cry series and video gaming.

    Register Log in

DmC E3 GameTrailers Interview

HailTheKing

Battousai The Manslayer

4:15 "We could see the sequels to this (DmC) series, we could see the sequels to the original DMC series or we could see both, Anything is possible! :w00t:

Great, that means there is still hope for the original series sequels!! :)

CAPC:troll:M
 
i personally don't want BOTH one of them must prevail. DMC is dead to me when it comes to it's story.
That's not correct. I assure you many people are interested in Vergil's and Dante's past. But doing a prequal without DMC story creators won't work, and i say this because it's highly unlikely Hideki Kamiya will ever decide to work for Capcom again.

It's no point to make a prequal that is a alternative story of the twin's past. We need the real one :) Hidek + the story team!
 
That's not correct. I assure you many people are interested in Vergil's and Dante's past. But doing a prequal without DMC story creators won't work, and i say this because it's highly unlikely Hideki Kamiya will ever decide to work for Capcom again.

It's no point to make a prequal that is a alternative story of the twin's past. We need the real one :) Hidek + the story team!

DMC3 disagrees with you. DMC doesn't need Kamiya. But that aside there is a point to making a prequel in this universe, by making i mean the DmC that's coming out now, it can be the new cannon a different universe. Not only that but it wouldn't need prequels or to backtrack going forward depending on how it's all explained. DmC could explain everything DMC didn't and do it far better without needing to backtrack as new games a new iteration releases like the old series did.

People might be interested in Dante and Vergil's but there is no longer any point in going back. they could've explained it in DMC3 but didn't actually do so. If by chance they do go back what could they do exactly? Teenage dante? that's being done now, oh and mind you a teenage dante wouldn't have a DT due to cannon. There's nothing capcom can do in the gaming universe to explain that history. They could release a novel though....

Now if you by chance decide to go back and do a game involving sparda, which would be a brilliant idea normally, you would still have problems in the form of IT WONT BE ABOUT DANTE FOR SOMETIME. Then there the romance cliche which of course is going to be thrown in and still no explanation on the vergil dante history. This idea would be good but it wouldn't have dante and might need more then one game to pull off.

So in the end the people who want the history between vergil and dante can not have it in the form of a game. That would due to a dumbed down gameplay and just going backwards in the character development chart...... which i will speak off some other time now i need to fap
 
DMC3 disagrees with you.
All it was is a mediocre story that was an alternative version of how Vergil died. And most of scenes weren't decent dialogues but careless scenes where Dante mocked demons.


DMC doesn't need Kamiya.
For a prequal that is about Vergil and Dante's past it does. Unless you can prove that Hideki Kamiya had no involvement with DMC 1 story then your statement is a empty one.


But that aside there is a point to making a prequel in this universe, by making i mean the DmC that's coming out now, it can be the new cannon a different universe. Not only that but it wouldn't need prequels or to backtrack going forward depending on how it's all explained. DmC could explain everything DMC didn't and do it far better without needing to backtrack as new games a new iteration releases like the old series did.
I find it hard to understand your message here.

People might be interested in Dante and Vergil's but there is no longer any point in going back. they could've explained it in DMC3 but didn't actually do so. If by chance they do go back what could they do exactly? Teenage dante? that's being done now, oh and mind you a teenage dante wouldn't have a DT due to cannon. There's nothing capcom can do in the gaming universe to explain that history. They could release a novel though....
There is a point in going back. By doing so DMC fans will get to see Dante and Vergil at age between 13-15. As for teenage Dante comment, that's DmC Dante. He's just a character that has been built based on Dante.
DT has a part in story and gameplay. From a story aspect it significant is that it's Dante's demonic blood changing his outer look. From a gameplay perspective it's a gameplay thing that boosts your attacks but at same time changing Dante's look as seen in story.
And Dante said in DMC 1 "Even as child i had demon powers".
Whether it's pointless is just your opinion really, and why do you suggest a novel? What's so wrong if for example next 3 years Capcom releases "DMC: The past" and "DmC 2"?

Now if you by chance decide to go back and do a game involving sparda, which would be a brilliant idea normally, you would still have problems in the form of IT WONT BE ABOUT DANTE FOR SOMETIME. Then there the romance cliche which of course is going to be thrown in and still no explanation on the vergil dante history. This idea would be good but it wouldn't have dante and might need more then one game to pull off.
When the story isn't about Dante then you can play as Sparda. The story about Eva and Sparda being cliche is your opinion really, no need to say it as if it's a fact.

So in the end the people who want the history between vergil and dante can not have it in the form of a game. That would due to a dumbed down gameplay and just going backwards in the character development chart...... which i will speak off some other time now i need to fap
That's your opinion. It has great potential story wise. And gameplay wise it can be very good if Capcom thinks outside of the box.

I mean what's wrong with playing as a 14 year old Vergil or Dante? We are talking about kids not adults, so you don't have think "Well he won't have Yamato" etc.
 
Devil May Cry 3 was the only of the original games that had a good story, imo.
Just putting that out there.
The foundation that DMC 3 story stands on is from DMC 1.
Your statment is just your opinion. And a wrong one i must say.
 
DMC1 was the one that set the story and... literally invented it. So obviously DMC1 is the one with the best story. DMC3 is the one with the best story-telling, because things are a little bit better explained as you play compared to all of the other titles. Nevertheless, DMC games are all horrible at story-telling, nobody can argue that, and those who do have never read a book or watched a good movie.
 
DMC's story was so simple, though.

Granted, DMC3's story wasn't really complex but there was more to it and it was told better.
 
Humour me. Why is my opinion wrong? What should my opinion be instead?
"DMC 3 only game of original games that had a good story".

1) Mysterious person (Arkham/Trish)appears = messenger to Mundus/Vergil.
2) Dante goes to island/Tower
3) Dante fights Mundus/Vergil.

Arkham twist is just story from DMC 2 about a villain who wants power put into 3 as Dante tries to stop Vergil.

And at end of DMC 3 Lady realizes that there can be demons that can be kind and humans that can be as evil as demons. Similar to Dante's line in DMC 1 "Trish Devil's don't cry" refering to Trish isn't evil.

But if you still think i am wrong about your judging that DMC 3 is only good story game from DMC serie then i give up.

And note i am not a clown. So i suggest you show me some respect as i will and have to you and not tell me to "humour" you.
All i have said is that i disagree with your opinion, and with that opened a discussion between you and me.

@ Angelmode:
The moment when Dante recalls memory of his birthday was a beacon of light in telling a story. So DMC 1 isn't totally dry whenit comes to story telling.
 
Am i the only who is tired of watching interviews again and again?
But i still need to watch them because of infos *sigh*
 
"DMC 3 only game of original games that had a good story".

1) Mysterious person (Arkham/Trish)appears = messenger to Mundus/Vergil.
2) Dante goes to island/Tower
3) Dante fights Mundus/Vergil.

Arkham twist is just story from DMC 2 about a villain who wants power put into 3 as Dante tries to stop Vergil.

And at end of DMC 3 Lady realizes that there can be demons that can be kind and humans that can be as evil as demons. Similar to Dante's line in DMC 1 "Trish Devil's don't cry" refering to Trish isn't evil.

But if you still think i am wrong about your judging that DMC 3 is only good story game from DMC serie then i give up.

And note i am not a clown. So i suggest you show me some respect as i will and have to you and not tell me to "humour" you.
All i have said is that i disagree with your opinion, and with that opened a discussion between you and me.

@ Angelmode:
The moment when Dante recalls memory of his birthday was a beacon of light in telling a story. So DMC 1 isn't totally dry whenit comes to story telling.

Is there a law for me having to respect you? Nope.
You are entitled to your opinion though, as I am to mine. And I am keeping mine. ^^
 
Back
Top Bottom