19th for me
The reason I say this is because:
1.) where was Sparda when the attack happened? This still hasn't been cleared up.
2.) if he was present, why did he let Eva take one for the team? Doesn't that smack of cowardice?
3.) Why is it not stipulated what happened to Vergil? Did Sparda raise Vergil himself? We see Sparda dumping Dante at an orphanage with demons (stupid), nothing about Vergil though. I know, right, that Dante is the MC, but NT gave us more on Kat's history than they did on Vergil's. What the hell is up with that?
4.) How did Sparda get caught? How? HOW? HOW? (I feel like Po)
The only improvement storywise is that the dialogue wasn't confined to cheesy one liners 90% of the time. Otherwise it's pretty much as loop-holey as the classic series.on topic- I felt DmC was an improvement storywise because it did provide a little more context for these characters and the world they live in so i have a better sense of this series than i did for the old series but they didnt manage to use the new elements to their full potential so they feel more set dressing and the story just feels like a rehash of DMC3.
So its a better story but not by much nor as rememberable or groundbreaking as they make it out to be.
The reason I say this is because:
1.) where was Sparda when the attack happened? This still hasn't been cleared up.
2.) if he was present, why did he let Eva take one for the team? Doesn't that smack of cowardice?
3.) Why is it not stipulated what happened to Vergil? Did Sparda raise Vergil himself? We see Sparda dumping Dante at an orphanage with demons (stupid), nothing about Vergil though. I know, right, that Dante is the MC, but NT gave us more on Kat's history than they did on Vergil's. What the hell is up with that?
4.) How did Sparda get caught? How? HOW? HOW? (I feel like Po)