Yes some skeptics and some supporters do act childish however here is a prime reason as of why people are arguing for so long. Its the fact that people (on both sides) tends to generalize a lot on how the other side acts, which leads to people having a stereotypical view on a person whoever fits which side.
Amen to that.
In some posts I seen some people tend to believe that it's the skeptics at fault when in reality all parties are equally responsible. For one, if they knew that they would receive backlash then it would be best to keep personal opinion out of the earlier PR. No one could have expected this kind of backlash. This has been blown so completely out of proportion, it's just not funny anymore.
Saying "Devil May Cry was out of date" "Devil May Cry was about clothing, music etc" and calling another game by one of the people who helped create the first Devil May Cry (Kamiya) "Japanesey"/over the top which he was he wasn't looking for.
Well Capcom wasn't looking for it either, when my sources speak true.
Now he is entitled for his opinion but all it did was stir up more questions and because of the Japanesey comment it stirred up bad blood. Made me think "If you feel that way, then why work on this game?"
Capcom asked them to/ it looks great on your portfolio/ re-developing a classic is a chance to be successful big time/ there's a lot of money in the gaming buisiness and the more popular your franchise, the better for your purse. If Capcom felt, they had to appeal to make DmC a Western thing, then that's not NT's fault at all.