Solar the rabbit
Well-known Member
Yay or Nay?
He still be his own character.I wouldn't really mind.
Though I would prefer if Nero was his own character.
He still be his own character.
I get that. I'm saying he still be Nero.I think he meant like Nero had his own origin/background that was unique to him and didn't just simply relate him to the pre-existing characters.
I get that. I'm saying he still be Nero.
I forgot what I was trying to say. Just head my head pretty hard.Either way he'd be Nero. I'm not sure I'm entirely following you here. And he wouldn't really be the Nero we know him as from DMC.
Hopefully if they did include Nero in DmC they'd be allowed more creative liberty with his character unlike say Dante/Vergil. I'd really like them to go wild and give him a radically different personality than either Dante or Vergil just for contrast and to make him stand out.Believe it or not, Nero's the one thing I wouldn't want to see in DmC, mostly because him and the New Dante share a lot of similarities in terms of personality and mannerisms. I know a lot of people call Nero a Dante-clone, but he and the rebooted Dante co-existing in the same universe, projecting the same airs of roguish cockiness and rebellious nature would be exceptionally jading.
It would just kill the newer Dante's uniqueness. Unless he had matured or evolved significantly by the time Nero enters the story.
Why do people say what I want to say but better?Nero is a character I'm unsure about so him getting drastically rebooted and disconnected from Dante in the reboot was something I thought about.
However bringing him in as Dante and Kat's kid is a fast and simple way and allows for different opportunities for Dante and Kat to explore. Family Legacy takes on a different meaning than it did in the classic games. In the classic games Dante was burdened by the fallout of Sparda's actions and now he would have to consider the fallout of his actions towards Nero.
It comes full circle.
Why not? Please explain.Nay and never ever.
I kind of figured that Lady and Vergil had gotten their jig on and that's where Nero stemmed from.Yay or Nay?
I hear what you're saying but if they consider dragging Nero into DmC I'm all for it since it's unlikely that Nero will appear in any subsequent vanilla DMC's. And if you go on the change of Dante's character from DMC3 to DMC4, he's toned down a bit. Still witty and taking jabs at opponents and such but a lot less 'yo mama'. It's safe to say that the same growth would be applied to an older version of DmC Dante as well. As much as I'm not a fan of the appearance of DmC, I'm definitely a fan of the story, and Dante had grown from a careless sexual deviant with no direction at the start of the game, to someone with depth and motivation and purpose by the end. Massive character development. In ONE game. NT did a bloody good job. Capcom sucks at story which is why vanilla Dante is always stagnant throughout the games. (m'kay, to their credit they did try in DMC3)Believe it or not, Nero's the one thing I wouldn't want to see in DmC, mostly because him and the New Dante share a lot of similarities in terms of personality and mannerisms. I know a lot of people call Nero a Dante-clone, but he and the rebooted Dante co-existing in the same universe, projecting the same airs of roguish cockiness and rebellious nature would be exceptionally jading.
It would just kill the newer Dante's uniqueness. Unless he had matured or evolved significantly by the time Nero enters the story.