most of those are from the leak proved to be falseI dont know how I feel about him potentially being a random character. This is supposedly the conclusion of the sons of Sparda as far as Itsuno is concerned. Mundus has returned for revenge, Vergil is back, Trish will have her biggest role since DMC1 (which makes sense if the baddy is Mundus), and out of nowhere we got this random guy as one of the titular characters? The three main characters to end the sons of Sparda story are, Dante, Nero and random guy?
Just saying, either way i'm sure i'll enjoy it.
most of those are from the leak proved to be false
>Originally DMCV was intended to be announced at PSX but after receiving feedback on their E3 press conference, Sony decided to scale back on PSX and instead scale up E3 2018. DMCV was an unfortunate casualty of this choice and thus it’s unlikely that DMCV gets officially revealed in 2017.https://www.resetera.com/threads/le...-5-info-potential-heavy-spoilers-inside.8198/
This has been proven false? Posted in 2017 and most have come true.
So has it been proven false or not? I really dont want to argue with you, esspecially about which leak/rumor is more true (unless your "new information" is a fact).>Originally DMCV was intended to be announced at PSX but after receiving feedback on their E3 press conference, Sony decided to scale back on PSX and instead scale up E3 2018. DMCV was an unfortunate casualty of this choice and thus it’s unlikely that DMCV gets officially revealed in 2017.
>There is some form of Playstation exclusivity involved. Sony is paying for some of the funding for the game but the extent of it is not known. Could be completely PS4 exclusive, console exclusive or timed exclusive. If the game is announced publicly then it will be at a Sony event, which is why many people thought that it was going to be at PSX.
See? It's pretty much early "leak" that seems to be false per see. I would wait and see before taking anything of those seriously. also
>Characters switch during key story points in the game.
It directoly contradicts new information.
I'm not arguing, I just highlighted stuff proved to be false. As far as I know new information comes directly from capcom. But I'll think we need to wait and see.So has it been proven false or not? I really dont want to argue with you, esspecially about which leak/rumor is more true (unless your "new information" is a fact).
where did you get he was Nero's twinIf the new information about V is real, he is probably Nero's twin, but there is something still weird about it, since Vitale couldn't be his real name.
Apparent age, built, demonic powers, etc. It's possible V is totally unrelated to Sparda's blood, but lazy as Capcom is, V is Nero's twin or Dante's son.where did you get he was Nero's twin
he was adopted by Nico's family
No, none of that. :bored:talked about how he could be a time displaced young sparda a la Bayonetta.