http://www.naturalnews.com/035616_cancer_industry_scientific_fraud_studies.html
I have heard all kinds of rumours about this, including the idea that a cheap 'cure' for cancer already exists, it's just not being developed or marketed properly, perhaps because pharmaceutical corporations want more money out of a 'miracle cure'?
This report, though I can believe. I notice how there are so many headlines about health in the last 10 or 15 years or so, every couple of years someone claims a new 'link' and yet the studies do not seem to be backed up with long-term data? Like, one minute they claim obesity is linked to this, then that... or chocolate makes you thin, then reduces risks of cancer, then makes you fat if you eat too much (obviously!) and now they're back to claiming 'it's good for you'... all this 'pop science' is awful and only serves to confuse people. (And, laughably, then we have fast food giants being appointed as some kind of government-approved 'health advisors'...)
From a scientific viewpoint, this is very disheartening. My mother is a scientist and I myself was going to follow the path to be one and did for a while, and it's shocking to see this kind of attitude among scientists and their funding bodies today. Science is surely the search for fact, not money. Any self-respecting scientist knows if he or she lies in their experiments, or conducts pointless experiments without context or a decent sample size, all they are doing is making human progress stall or even go backwards. The fundamental principle of science is to find out the truth, not lie to get more funding.
... And yet it doesn't really surprise because our government and others are hell-bent on turning academic institutions into businesses. This, to my mind, can only bad for all of us, and for the world at large. How are we going forwards, if this is how things are going to be done - and if most funding comes from self-interested corporations? When you have institutions that exist to find out the truth about things, integrity is surely important - more important even than cost, else what is the point? And "career scientists" of this type are more harm than good to anybody.
Privatizing universities and research institutions = bad news.
Thoughts...?
I have heard all kinds of rumours about this, including the idea that a cheap 'cure' for cancer already exists, it's just not being developed or marketed properly, perhaps because pharmaceutical corporations want more money out of a 'miracle cure'?
This report, though I can believe. I notice how there are so many headlines about health in the last 10 or 15 years or so, every couple of years someone claims a new 'link' and yet the studies do not seem to be backed up with long-term data? Like, one minute they claim obesity is linked to this, then that... or chocolate makes you thin, then reduces risks of cancer, then makes you fat if you eat too much (obviously!) and now they're back to claiming 'it's good for you'... all this 'pop science' is awful and only serves to confuse people. (And, laughably, then we have fast food giants being appointed as some kind of government-approved 'health advisors'...)
From a scientific viewpoint, this is very disheartening. My mother is a scientist and I myself was going to follow the path to be one and did for a while, and it's shocking to see this kind of attitude among scientists and their funding bodies today. Science is surely the search for fact, not money. Any self-respecting scientist knows if he or she lies in their experiments, or conducts pointless experiments without context or a decent sample size, all they are doing is making human progress stall or even go backwards. The fundamental principle of science is to find out the truth, not lie to get more funding.
... And yet it doesn't really surprise because our government and others are hell-bent on turning academic institutions into businesses. This, to my mind, can only bad for all of us, and for the world at large. How are we going forwards, if this is how things are going to be done - and if most funding comes from self-interested corporations? When you have institutions that exist to find out the truth about things, integrity is surely important - more important even than cost, else what is the point? And "career scientists" of this type are more harm than good to anybody.
Privatizing universities and research institutions = bad news.
Thoughts...?