LeoXCV
Single life for life
Let me put this into computer nerd terms.
It's definitely hacked. It's based on the fact the leaderboard scores use int32 as their value type. The score on the leaderboard can only go between -2,147,483,648 to positive 2,147,483,648. The score starts at 0 and once it hits positive 2,147,483,648, it backtracks all the way back to 0, and into the negatives. Because of this any negative number will be considered higher than the positives, and depending on how they code the leaderboard the highest score possible will either be -1 or -2,147,483,648 (Based on other leaderboards I've seen where larger digit negatives get higher spots). It's why after some time hacked leaderboards will have the same exact score at the top because it is the highest possible. From the looks of things DmC's highest score possible will be -1.
In other words, in order to get these scores legit into the negatives you would have to get 2,147,483,648*2 = 4,294,967,296 + 1. Which is impossible using legit techniques.
This is 99% certainty from me.
It's definitely hacked. It's based on the fact the leaderboard scores use int32 as their value type. The score on the leaderboard can only go between -2,147,483,648 to positive 2,147,483,648. The score starts at 0 and once it hits positive 2,147,483,648, it backtracks all the way back to 0, and into the negatives. Because of this any negative number will be considered higher than the positives, and depending on how they code the leaderboard the highest score possible will either be -1 or -2,147,483,648 (Based on other leaderboards I've seen where larger digit negatives get higher spots). It's why after some time hacked leaderboards will have the same exact score at the top because it is the highest possible. From the looks of things DmC's highest score possible will be -1.
In other words, in order to get these scores legit into the negatives you would have to get 2,147,483,648*2 = 4,294,967,296 + 1. Which is impossible using legit techniques.
This is 99% certainty from me.
