any website deemed by the government to be in violation of copyright, yes. not only deleted... a website is integrated into the rest of the web. almost 100 field experts were called in and they said the damage it would do to sites that aren't even related would be there. it would cause a TON of problems for the web as a whole.Faustinasa;281713 said:So technically you're saying that any website could potentially be deleted?
i think it should be a good incentive for musicians to, instead of submitting to record companies, circulate their own music for free. or have torrent friendly versions of their albums with tracks missing. when you think about it, it's really extremely silly that you should have to pay for something as basic as music. i think the day when it circulates freely, and a bands popularity is determined by torrent trackers and the like would be a great one. good bands would undeniably emerge, and not just because of some record labels politics. my opposition to the bill goes beyond all this, but i think music should be free. with such a free circulation concert attendance would probably go up too.Meg;281729 said:Seeings how pirated music is in fact illegal it shouldn't matter if bands like it or not. Its stealing, plain and simple. Yeah it gets the music out to people and bands don't make much from CD sales anyway, but the record companies do. If people don't buy CDs then the companies lose money and aren't gonna bother with bands that aren't super popular. That really constricts what bands the masses listen to. What do you think, Cheez?
the webs changing just about every market and media outlet, i think we should embrace it in it's entirety rather than delete the parts we may disagree with.