DarkSlayerZero
DMC1 Dante>>>>>>2-4
The FIRST game of a series is NEVER the third Chronologically. You NEVER see that because it's just confusing as f*ck and retarded as hell.
MGS3 is chronologically the first MSG Game and Im not complaining.
The FIRST game of a series is NEVER the third Chronologically. You NEVER see that because it's just confusing as f*ck and retarded as hell.
MGS3 is chronologically the first MSG Game and Im not complaining.
Their reasoning is quite odd... Just because DMC was a success does not mean any other games would be. And besides, those games were good, and the fame they would've drawn from their ratings would have definitely measured up to good sells....
Not sure if it's true. Just my best guess.
Those games drew in good ratings and modest sales but not enough to satisfy cap com.
Well I think fans tend not to complain about MG3 being before 1 since they tend to trust in Kojima and his game plan and believe he knows where he is going which is something DMC lacks.
DMC had direction. That direction consisted of Hideki.What it lacks... Direction. They just made it up as they went. Sort of the 'villain of the week' mindset. That's how most Japanese action games are made. Ninja theory already knew (and revealed) what a heavenly sword sequel would entail despite not getting to make it. Sucks too, Would've been awesome to see Nariko fight her way out of Hell.
DMC 2-4 is "made it up as they went".
.
Z218 said DMC had no direction.I think that for them to have been "making it up as it they went" they did a pretty good job on the origin story that is DMC3.
Which shows that they did indeed have good story telling qualities IMO.
But as Z218 said, they simply did not want to fully apply themselves to making a coherent storyline and follow someone's lead.
Z218 said DMC had no direction.
It's not that they didn't have direction, it's just nobody wanted to follow someone else lead. They weren't on the same page.
Ah right. I agree.Read above.
I was referring to this part he said
the best answer yetDMC3 only fits with dmc1 if you put your mind to it, and ignore the obvious holes in the story.
Its so true, and in every thread that has something to do with the origins, Tony RedGrave usually gives everyone a DMC lesson on why DMC has no continuity.the best answer yet
yeahIts so true, and in every thread that has something to do with the origins, Tony RedGrave usually gives everyone a DMC lesson on why DMC has no continuity.
So pretty much, this all comes back around to it being Capcom's fault. But I wouldn't say they have bad storytelling ideas. Look at Megaman for example, that had such a good story that it held through... 4 different heroes. Do you guys think its because Capcom just didn't put its all into DMC?
So pretty much, this all comes back around to it being Capcom's fault. But I wouldn't say they have bad storytelling ideas. Look at Megaman for example, that had such a good story that it held through... 4 different heroes. Do you guys think its because Capcom just didn't put its all into DMC?