St. Nathaniel
Nephilim Reaper
Didn't stop Capcom from making DMC4 after DMC3 sold worse than DMC2.Kinda too soon to greenlight DmC2 since it sold badly and haven't so far reached Capcoms goals.
Didn't stop Capcom from making DMC4 after DMC3 sold worse than DMC2.Kinda too soon to greenlight DmC2 since it sold badly and haven't so far reached Capcoms goals.
DMC3 was more well recieved than DmC.Didn't stop Capcom from making DMC4 after DMC3 sold worse than DMC2.
Metacritic says otherwise. According to that, DmC was the second most well recieved game in the series after DMC1.DMC3 was more well recieved than DmC.
By who, fans or critics?DMC3 was more well recieved than DmC.
And sticking his head stuck on Mr Evil, stamping a F bomb after his name or making a cancer joke isn't? [The latter two I've seen around.]
And it doesn't taken genius to figure it out that insults over the last few years are a possible factor. Maybe you're right and we're wrong, but we're not being offensive if we are.
...Wait, why is this even a thread on the DmC section? Shouldn't it be in General Discussion or the main Devil May Cry General Discussion instead?
Ah yes, Metacritic. Since apparently you can completely trust gaming journalism in these modern times where ads now pays for reviewers pay.Metacritic says otherwise. According to that, DmC was the second most well recieved game in the series after DMC1.
I find journalism to be just as reliable as customer reviews. Since half the time most customer reviews are completely biased and they tend to rip into games for silly reasons. I'd glady trust journalism over that (which I don't, I trust my own opinion). However, just because you don't trust journalism doesn't mean that the reviews aren't genuine nor that it wasn't well received. The fact that you're trying to discredit it says quite a lot.Ah yes, Metacritic. Since apparently you can completely trust gaming journalism in these modern times where ads now pays for reviewers pay.
Capcom expected DmC to sell atleast 2 million copies, it's no way near that goal and just barely reaching their lowered current 1.2 million mark. I'm not trying to be negative, just realistic.
I never said I don't trust gaming journalism at all, I just don't eat everything that is presented in front of me. What really bothered me about the DmC reviews is that very few brought up the glaring issues with DmC that everyone I knew that played DmC all agreed on. I remember one reviewer not liking how much easier DmC was and that the combat system was pretty "dumbed down" and yet he gave it a 9/10.I find journalism to be just as reliable as customer reviews. Since half the time most customer reviews are completely biased and they tend to rip into games for silly reasons. I'd glady trust journalism over that (which I don't, I trust my own opinion). However, just because you don't trust journalism doesn't mean that the reviews aren't genuine nor that it wasn't well received. The fact that you're trying to discredit it says quite a lot.
The fact that you're trying to discredit it says quite a lot.
I feel you. It bugged me how every reviewer seemed to turn a blind eye to the issues that were so in our face, via the bosses idling or the sever texture loss on some of the levels. DmC honestly deserved an 7.5 or an 8 at best. It was a VERY good hack n' slash game in its own right, the graphics and combat system were great! But does it make it, the bets DMC out yet? Hell no! I had fun with it and I will still play it along with the BP and VD, but at the end of the day I will always go back to DMC4 for its amazing combat and challenging BP.I never said I don't trust gaming journalism at all, I just don't eat everything that is presented in front of me. What really bothered me about the DmC reviews is that very few brought up the glaring issues with DmC that everyone I knew that played DmC all agreed on. I remember one reviewer not liking how much easier DmC was and that the combat system was pretty "dumbed down" and yet he gave it a 9/10.
I'm not trying to discredit every reviewer out there but there are too many that doesn't do enough research etc.
But what am I saying! I'm just an "anti" after all so why should anyone listen to me.
Always have to look for an excuse..DMC3 was more well recieved than DmC.
Hah! I agree. His hair looked pretty awful back then.I think he looks better, by being shaved.
Besides, I'm glad he is talking about the next console. That means NT is already developing something. I guess Unreal Engine 4 on 60 fps for consoles is a go!
Always look for an excuse.Always have to look for an excuse..
Well DMC2 was badly received and they made DMC3.
I find
I am pretty realistic too, however I won't shoot down the possibility of DmC2. There have been plenty of games that have sold poorly and have gotten sequels.
I didn't look for an excuse.Always look for an excuse.
Well DmC was badly received so they went to gaming journalists.
Always have to look for an excuse..
The gaming market looks a bit different these days when every developer have set their eyes on making AAA titles. DmC was an AAA budget title and yet have failed to generate enough sales.Well DMC2 was badly received and they made DMC3.
Neither was he. refer to his post right there,^.I didn't look for an excuse.