Dante's Stalker
"Outrun this!"
There's been a lot of 'predictions' floating around on the internet, a lot of them are 'dreams' or 'visions' with random numbers. The latest I heard is some believers claiming a magnitude 9. something hitting the California coast in....mid-October to early November? I can't remember exactly. Something like that.
I'm not discrediting these people, but I do prefer to take the predictions of someone who has done the research and is constantly monitoring everything from eclipses and planetary alignments to solar flares and the effects these celestial movements have on our wee little planet, over someone who simply 'dreamed' a big quake is going to hit such and such a place at such and such a time.
I dreamed about the first Christchurch earthquake. In a sense, it was a premonition of what was to come, but it only clicked together after it happened. That's what predictions usually are, or the Biblical sort anyway. You think John knew what any of the events mentioned in Revelation meant? Maybe some, but not all. Some things are symbolic, some aren't - it's distinguishing between what is literal and what isn't that can only occur after the event of the prediction has taken place.
Anyway, not here to debate my faith or people who can see into the future, it's just what inspired me to get back into earthquake watch.
He had also forecast for November earthquakes:
Nov 1-2 South Sandwich Islands (magnitude 6.6 - 6.9)
Nov 5-6 Western Montana/Nevada (M6.5 - 6.8)
Nov 15-16 Southeastern Alaska (M6.9 - 7.2)
Nov 22-23 Russia/China/Sumatra (M7.0 - 7.3)
Nov 29-30 Western Honshu, Japan (M6.5 - 7.0)
There's also a lot of talk about comet Ison. As it stands a lot of people are a lot more interested in whether they'll be able to see it or not, but I do wonder if its presence so close to earth, with all the planetary alignments and gravitational pulls happening, if it would spark a quake/reaction that the earthquake monitors have not taken into account.
I'm not discrediting these people, but I do prefer to take the predictions of someone who has done the research and is constantly monitoring everything from eclipses and planetary alignments to solar flares and the effects these celestial movements have on our wee little planet, over someone who simply 'dreamed' a big quake is going to hit such and such a place at such and such a time.
I dreamed about the first Christchurch earthquake. In a sense, it was a premonition of what was to come, but it only clicked together after it happened. That's what predictions usually are, or the Biblical sort anyway. You think John knew what any of the events mentioned in Revelation meant? Maybe some, but not all. Some things are symbolic, some aren't - it's distinguishing between what is literal and what isn't that can only occur after the event of the prediction has taken place.
Anyway, not here to debate my faith or people who can see into the future, it's just what inspired me to get back into earthquake watch.
He had also forecast for November earthquakes:
Nov 1-2 South Sandwich Islands (magnitude 6.6 - 6.9)
Nov 5-6 Western Montana/Nevada (M6.5 - 6.8)
Nov 15-16 Southeastern Alaska (M6.9 - 7.2)
Nov 22-23 Russia/China/Sumatra (M7.0 - 7.3)
Nov 29-30 Western Honshu, Japan (M6.5 - 7.0)
There's also a lot of talk about comet Ison. As it stands a lot of people are a lot more interested in whether they'll be able to see it or not, but I do wonder if its presence so close to earth, with all the planetary alignments and gravitational pulls happening, if it would spark a quake/reaction that the earthquake monitors have not taken into account.
