• Welcome to the Devil May Cry Community Forum!

    We're a group of fans who are passionate about the Devil May Cry series and video gaming.

    Register Log in

DmC vs DMC 1 (Story vs Story)

Which games story was best?

  • DmC

    Votes: 4 28.6%
  • DMC 1

    Votes: 5 35.7%
  • Equal

    Votes: 5 35.7%

  • Total voters
    14

IncarnatedDemon

Well-known Member
This is a thread asking you which story you think was best and vote accordingly.

Story includes but is not limited to dialogue, plot, character development,
 

DragonMaster2010

Don't Let the Fall of America be Your Fall
DmC obviously, but here's why I believe that as such.

DMC1 went on as a B-action J-film. Now I do love J-films and their use of over the top style and presentation, but there are times when it can seem so fake to the common eye. DMC1's story was a bit to cliche and generic at times for a B-movie. It's script and delivery of lines honestly could have been a little better to fit the character's feelings and actions. The story for DMC1 itself is a basic story; go to an island, kill demons, save the world while discovering new things, or in DMC1's case, why does this mysterious woman look like my mother? DMC1's story wasn't the best thing I've seen come out of Japan in terms of story back in 2001, but it wasn't the most awful either. DMC1's story filled its purpose as an event going on and an excuse to have all these cool powers and mechanics. The characters, action, and stylish action came first with the true story being the icing on the cake back in the day. However, I still wished they did better. I mean look at Kingdom Hearts 1 which came out around 2001; it had both story and great gameplay. DMC1 could've had that, but it failed to do so and only focused on looking cool instead of trying to fill out both sides of the game's points.

DmC's story is much more to the early cinematic classic B-movies of action like fight club and They Live mixed with a James Dean-like character whose out to change the world. With DmC, NT focused on actually giving Devil May Cry a story that made sense and was as cinematic as the gameplay. It was filled with good character interaction, a very appealing environment to play in, and some dark elements that gave the feel of suspense. However, its story also has its fair share of flaws like the Angels; where are they the entire game? Or the true affects of Limbo now that its mixed with the real world, will there still be places breaking apart, and what will be the result of the human populace? Will it be like the original series? Questions that could be fixed with either dialog or a sequel. But despite all this, DmC did a better job in putting more meat into the story, however suffered in putting a little less into gameplay when considering DMC3 and DMC4. Naturally it has surpassed DMC1, and dominated DMC2, however in gameplay its one level behind DMC3, but definitely exccels higher in story then 3, and 4. But 4 has DmC beat in gameplay.

All in all, I'm gonna go with DmC because of its actual beauty with scenery, characters are a lot more entertaining to both hear and watch as they go through this demon struggle, the feeling of the game isn't filled with so much anime flash and is more gritty like a Sin City feel to it for me, (and I'm a total Sin City fanboy) it's gameplay was like a movie as well giving cinematic style to the very movements of Dante, the bosses, though easy, were visually interesting and very adding to the story's enemies, and the antagonist was more threatening on both a contemperate level, and a wide colossal level.

I just felt myself more engaged with DmC then DMC1.
 

AlastorSword

“Must not sleep... must warn others."
I prefer DMC1's story to DmC. It had much more interesting finds in 1 and less pretentiousness to boot with the characters. Though I'll admit, DMC1 is old school cheesy, but hey, I wouldn't want it any other way. Lol
 

Chancey289

Fake Geek Girl.
DMC 1 is still my favorite in the entire franchise because it's what got me involved in one of my favorite franchises for starters and it knows what it is.

DMC 1 has simple, cliched, and cheesiness all around. It's also a game that's very aware of that. It knows that Dante is like the epitome of these cheesy action heroes. It knows it's story is a simple good vs. evil stuff. It doesn't try to be anything more than that when it comes to story.

DMC 3 and 4 just lost that spirit and that's what's sh!t. Stories that try to be dramatic and cartoonish at the same time and also failing to find the balance in between them. It's like two kinds of people sitting in a room and while one wants to stay super cartoonish and silly the other half wants to attempt some actual drama so they meet each other halfway. And that's when you get "KYRIEEEE!" *PUKES*

DmC was a nice throwback to the spirit of the first game to some extent. It's also doing something completely different and so that's where you need to understand something called context and I judge it on its own merit than being the typical fanboy who is only bashing DmC because it's different which makes you look like you're missing the f#cking point.

DmC has more well rounded characters. Some actually decent character development. (I still like DMC 1 Dante the most though because of nostalgic heartstrings and all) All while at the same time being very self aware and not taking itself too seriously at all. It's a social satire that's about as subtle as a RPG point blank to the face. It's cheesy and over the top with both its satire and the antics its characters do. *GASP* Isn't this like Devil May Cry? Holy sh!t guys. Which brings me to my next point.

DMC was like the epitome of those old school action heroes and movies and Dante represents that. It was always like a statement. It knew that. It wasn't trying to be anything else.

DmC does that same thing. It's still pretty over the top and cheesy. It also still translates a statement about contemporary times. And it tries to be nothing else but that and a Devil May Cry game that's intention is to still do something fresh. Which was again the entire freaking point.

When you break it down and look at it DMC and DmC are not very different at all.

The better story with the better characters and more depth is hands down DmC. It's got the best storytelling out of the bunch. Which was one of the intentions. It's got focus.

DMC has focus too. It's cheesy and cliched but the game is always fully aware of that.

Two stories that set out to do a job and also accomplish it.

Yet all the bias fanboys ever do is unfairly bash a game that sure as hell isn't a bad game at all and one of the better ones in the series (that I still believe most never played) and only complain how it isn't the generic bishounen anime BS from DMC 3 and 4 because that's where most of you here came in and how you define the series as a whole.
 

ROCKMAN X

Keyser Söze
Even though i don't like DmC's modern era political story i have to say that it has overall more grounded characters and simply better written story.

DMC 1 wasn't really a story centric game like DmC you didn't get a cutscene at the end of every corner it was a simple a game for a simple generation much of the story was conveyed through the gameplay.
 
Top Bottom