I disagree. Hideki kamiya left capcom but it didn't stop him from developing Bayonetta(a character that is always compared to Dante of DMC). Shinji Mikami left capcom but that didn't stop him from developing Evil within(survival horror genre as Resident evil).
True, but I'm not sure how that is a counter to my argument. If anything it enforces it, since those people had to leave the company they were working for in order to make the games they wanted.
And besides that, Kamiya is in a higher position at Platinum Games than Itsuno is at Capcom, being one of the founders of the company, thus having more of a say over which games he's gonna make, I imagine.
As for Mikami, he is also a producer, not only a director.
Itsuno is still in capcom and can continue DMC unless he chooses other games such as Dragon's dogma.It doesn't matter if he is not the producer or "higher up" at capcom.
Heck yes it does. You think he can just decide to make a game and go for it using the company's resources just like that without answering to anyone? Itsuno is "just" a director, not a shot caller. He's
assigned projects from above. Sure, he can
propose projects to his superiors, (which is how DD got made, if I recall correctly) since Capcom is not a first party developer, but he still has to be given the green light by them, which can still decide to make him develop something else. So I can only assume this is what you meant, that you'd be upset if he ever pushed to propose the making of DD2 instead of DMC5's. In that sense yes, I can see where you're coming from when it comes to holding him accountable, so to speak.