Okay, so I was poking around Metacritic today for lols and I noticed that the average user score for DmC is...um...yeah. :blink: I then lurked around this little site because I was bored and found that many a people were annoyed with the user score average. While just about every game ever has its score skewed by biased fan/haters, some get it worse than others. Like DmC. SO! Since word of mouth and customer reviews are fine and dandy, I did some math and came up with a more accurate user score. Here it is:
PS3 Version: 4.5/10 out of 54 "legitimate" reviews.
I then went on Amazon and found this:
PS3/360 Combined: 1.55/5 out of 17 "legitimate" reviews.
:blink: Oh wow. I was expecting a 6.2 or something. Woooow. Well *ahem* here's how I did it.
- I did not count a single score of 0.
- The review had to be of substantial length and/or address in an unfanboyish/hater way, multiple aspects of the game. For instances, reviews that just said things like: "New Dante is gross. 1/10" were omitted. However, reviews that addressed gameplay, story, writing quality, whatever, were included. OR! If the review only focused on one part, but was well written and fair, then it got included.
Now what I consider a "substantial" review is just my opinion, so take my findings with a grain of salt. In fact, do your own math and see what you get. And no, I did not throughly read each review. Instead I skimmed each one enough to see if I could include it.
PS3 Version: 4.5/10 out of 54 "legitimate" reviews.
I then went on Amazon and found this:
PS3/360 Combined: 1.55/5 out of 17 "legitimate" reviews.
:blink: Oh wow. I was expecting a 6.2 or something. Woooow. Well *ahem* here's how I did it.
- I did not count a single score of 0.
- The review had to be of substantial length and/or address in an unfanboyish/hater way, multiple aspects of the game. For instances, reviews that just said things like: "New Dante is gross. 1/10" were omitted. However, reviews that addressed gameplay, story, writing quality, whatever, were included. OR! If the review only focused on one part, but was well written and fair, then it got included.
Now what I consider a "substantial" review is just my opinion, so take my findings with a grain of salt. In fact, do your own math and see what you get. And no, I did not throughly read each review. Instead I skimmed each one enough to see if I could include it.